Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Patients Evaluate the Food Service

Authors: R, VAN ANDEN;

Patients Evaluate the Food Service

Abstract

T HE FOOD-MANAGEMENT field has many erudite experts in the art of fine cooking and the science of nutrition, but cooking by the book doesn’t always pass the test of the taste buds. For this reason, we measure our food service at Hudson River State Hospital by the patients’ seal of palate approval. The first Monday of each month, the supervising dietitian and the food manager conduct a patients’ foodcommittee meeting which is attended by 12 to 14 men and women patients representing their particular wards. The group meets for about an hour in a small room in the administration building to discuss food preparation, food service, and food in general. Patients are encouraged to talk freely about anything pertaining to hospital food. After a period of general comments, there is a roundtable discussion in which each person is called upon for remarks. This prevents one or two people from monopolizing the meeting. When Mary complains that the Swiss steak was not tender or John says that the breakfast coffee was weak or Margaret prefers a new formula to an old one, we ask the others to give their opinions.

Keywords

Food Service, Hospital, Food Services, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!