Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Dissimilar dosing with high-potency and low-potency neuroleptics

Authors: R J, Baldessarini; B, Katz; P, Cotton;

Dissimilar dosing with high-potency and low-potency neuroleptics

Abstract

The authors studied high-potency versus low-potency neuroleptic dosing practices for 110 Boston-area psychiatric inpatients and compared the findings with the dosing practices reported in surveys of nearly 16,000 Veterans Administration patients. Mean chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the most common agents correlated strongly in both samples. Although frequencies of lower doses of both types of agents were similar, doses of potent drugs above the daily equivalent of 1 g of chlorpromazine accounted for more than 40% of prescriptions. The mean chlorpromazine-equivalent dose of popular potent agents (haloperidol or fluphenazine) was 3.54 times as high as that of popular low-potency agents (chlorpromazine or thioridazine). Potent agents are commonly used in mania and schizophrenia, often in relatively high doses, which may carry an excess of risk over unproven added benefit.

Keywords

Adult, Risk, Bipolar Disorder, Adolescent, Chlorpromazine, Thioridazine, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Drug Utilization, Hospitalization, Fluphenazine, Schizophrenia, Haloperidol, Humans, Aged, Antipsychotic Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    147
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
147
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!