
pmid: 7081484
The authors analyze the possible need for a standing national group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the psychotherapies. The current need is for a body whose function is more scientifically evaluative and less regulatory than the Food and Drug Administration because available psychotherapies are less specific in their beneficial effects and less dangerous than are drugs and because the practice of psychotherapy cannot be restricted entirely to the health professions. Even so, the authors believe the main criteria for discerning the boundaries between research and established practice are in principle at least as clear for psychotherapy as for other health interventions.
Quality Assurance, Health Care, Mental Disorders, Research, Consumer Behavior, United States, Psychotherapy, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Insurance, Psychiatric
Quality Assurance, Health Care, Mental Disorders, Research, Consumer Behavior, United States, Psychotherapy, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Insurance, Psychiatric
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 112 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
