
doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.1.51
pmid: 4855542
Physicians will be subject to periodic reexamination in the course of their professional careers. There is an urgent need to determine correlations between test results on examinations now being used and the actual competence of physicians in their clinical practice situations. The authors review several facets of the present status of testing: the internal reliability of tests, their content, and various testing methodologies. Data in all of these areas illustrate the difficulties involved in testing clinical competence and emphasize the need for research and action.
Education, Medical, Peer Review, Professional Review Organizations, Medicine, Professional Practice, Educational Measurement, United States, Specialization
Education, Medical, Peer Review, Professional Review Organizations, Medicine, Professional Practice, Educational Measurement, United States, Specialization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
