
pmid: 14402412
It is a purpose of philosophic analysis to clarify the meaning of concepts used in scientific discourse. An attempt to do so has been made here, with special reference to the value-terms used in psychiatry. Such terms as "mental health," "mental illness," "normal," "abnormal," "neurosis," "psychosis," "perversion," "psychopathic" or "sociopathic" personality have been subject to scrutiny. It has been shown that such terms cannot be defined scientifically. Therefore, it is suggested either that they not be used or that a precise statement of the basis of their use in any given case be made. Such attention to our use of language will bring rewards both in the clarity of our discourse and in the elimination of issues hitherto considered unsolved problems of science.
Psychiatry, Science, Humans
Psychiatry, Science, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
