
Finding the properties underlying beauty has always been a prominent yet difficult problem. However, new technological developments have often aided scientific progress by expanding the scientists' toolkit. Currently in the spotlight of cognitive neuroscience and vision science are deep neural networks. In this study, we have used a generative adversarial network (GAN) to generate images of increasing aesthetic value. We validated that this network indeed was able to increase the aesthetic value of an image by letting participants decide which of two presented images they considered more beautiful. As our validation was successful, we were justified to use the generated images to extract low- and mid-level features contributing to their aesthetic value. We compared the brightness, contrast, sharpness, saturation, symmetry, colorfulness, and visual complexity levels of "low-aesthetic" images to those of "high-aesthetic" images. We found that all of these features increased for the beautiful images, implying that they may play an important role underlying the aesthetic value of an image. With this study, we have provided further evidence for the potential value GANs may have for research concerning beauty.
Science & Technology, Esthetics, image beautification, mid-level image features, image preference, Experimental Psychology, aesthetic experience questionnaire, Article, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Ophthalmology, 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry, Humans, R PACKAGE, Neural Networks, Computer, generative adversarial networks, computational aesthetics, low-level image features, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Science & Technology, Esthetics, image beautification, mid-level image features, image preference, Experimental Psychology, aesthetic experience questionnaire, Article, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Ophthalmology, 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry, Humans, R PACKAGE, Neural Networks, Computer, generative adversarial networks, computational aesthetics, low-level image features, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 11 Medical and Health Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
