
In this chapter, the author studies Scheid's reconstruction from the point of view of Roman law. First, he deals with the comparison of noxae deditio in sacred, civil, and international law. Then, he compares Scaevola's regula on impiety with a responsum that the same Scaevola gave in a (civil law) case of unlawful damage. The central question in this contribution is the extent to which pontifical law was connected with civil law. According to Scheid, they had enough in common to allow reconstructing procedures of pontifical law with the help of civil law procedures. This chapter concludes by saying be that there is only a parallel in procedures in a non-technical sense. In the Roman republic, sacred law and civil law were closely linked because they were created and interpreted by the same persons using the same methods. Keywords:civil law; international law; pontifical law; sacred law; Scheid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
