
handle: 10419/153970
Prediction of macroeconomic aggregates is one of the primary functions of macroeconometric models, including dynamic factor models, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models, and vector autoregressions. This study establishes methods that improve the predictions of these models, using a representative model from each class and a canonical 7-variable postwar US data set. It focuses on prediction over the period 1966 through 2011. It measures the quality of prediction by the probability densities assigned to the actual values of these variables, one quarter ahead, by the predictive distributions of the models in real time. Two steps lead to substantial improvement. The …rst is to use full Bayesian predictive distributions rather than substitute a “plug-in” posterior mode for parameters. Across models and quarters, this leads to a mean improvement in probability of 50.4%. The second is to use an equally-weighted pool of predictive densities from the three models, which leads to a mean improvement in probability of 41.9% over the full Bayesian predictive distributions of the individual models. This im
analysis of variance, Bayesian model averaging, dynamic factor model, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, prediction pools, probability integral transform test, vector autoregression model, ddc:330, Bayesian model averaging, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, C51, probability integral transform test, prediction pools, vector autoregression model, dynamic factor model, Analysis of variance, C53, C11
analysis of variance, Bayesian model averaging, dynamic factor model, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, prediction pools, probability integral transform test, vector autoregression model, ddc:330, Bayesian model averaging, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, C51, probability integral transform test, prediction pools, vector autoregression model, dynamic factor model, Analysis of variance, C53, C11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
