
arXiv: 2412.07078
Abstract Adversarial defenses for textual data have gained considerable attention in recent years due to the increasing vulnerability of Natural Language Processing (NLP) models to adversarial attacks. These attacks exploit subtle perturbations in input text to deceive models, posing significant challenges to model robustness and reliability. This article introduces Defensive Dual Masking (DDM), a simple yet effective algorithm that uses two unique masking strategies to mitigate adversarial threats. Specifically, during training, [MASK] tokens are directly inserted into input samples to prepare the model for handling perturbed inputs. At inference time, suspicious tokens are identified and strategically replaced with [MASK] tokens, effectively neutralizing perturbations while preserving core semantics of the input text. The theoretical foundation of DDM demonstrates how the proposed masking strategies enhance the model capacity to mitigate adversarial attacks. Empirical evaluations based on four benchmark datasets and four adversarial attacks consistently demonstrate that DDM outperforms state-of-the-art defense techniques, achieving superior robustness and substantial improvements in model accuracy. Furthermore, DDM seamlessly integrates with Large Language Models, enhancing their resilience to adversarial attacks and providing a scalable defense solution for large-scale NLP applications.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computation and Language (cs.CL)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computation and Language (cs.CL)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
