Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage

Facts and Hypotheses
Authors: R G, Hart; B S, Boop; D C, Anderson;

Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage

Abstract

Background Intracranial hemorrhage is the most feared and lethal complication of oral anticoagulation. We review the frequency, predictors, and prognosis of this most common neurological complication of oral anticoagulation. Summary of Review Anticoagulation to conventional intensities increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage 7- to 10-fold, to an absolute rate of nearly 1%/y for many stroke-prone patients. Most (70%) anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhages are intracerebral hematomas (approximately 60% are fatal); the bulk of the remainder are subdural hematomas. Predictors of anticoagulant-related intracerebral hematoma are advanced patient age, prior ischemic stroke, hypertension, and intensity of anticoagulation. In approximately half of anticoagulated patients with intracerebral hematoma the bleeding evolves slowly over 12 to 24 hours, and emergency reversal of anticoagulation is crucial. Conclusions Both patient factors and anticoagulation intensity importantly influence the rate of anticoagulation-related intracranial hemorrhage. Patient-related risk factors for this complication overlap with those for ischemic stroke. The risk/benefit equation of anticoagulation for elderly, stroke-prone patients is complex and differs from that for younger patients. The absolute rate reduction (not the relative risk reduction) of ischemic stroke by anticoagulation is the critical issue and must offset accentuation of often lethal brain hemorrhage.

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Risk Factors, Age Factors, Anticoagulants, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Cerebral Hemorrhage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    526
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
526
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!