
pmid: 10601135
Letter to the Editor: At the NHLBI workshop on sodium and blood pressure held on January 28–29, 1999, to re-examine the US recommendation on sodium intake for healthy people, two meta-analyses addressing this issue were harshly criticized for including randomized clinical trials of less than 2 weeks duration. It was argued that their inclusion invalidated estimates of the blood pressure lowering potential of a sodium-restricted diet. This viewpoint has been expressed before in letters to the editor1 and in editorials.2 3 Yet, Hypertension continues to publish short-term intervention studies such as that by He et al, which compared the effects of a 5-day low sodium diet (10 mmol/d) on …
Time Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Research Design, Hypertension, Humans, Diet, Sodium-Restricted, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Time Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Research Design, Hypertension, Humans, Diet, Sodium-Restricted, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
