Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Role of Type 1 and Type 2 Angiotensin Receptors in Angiotensin II–Induced Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy

Authors: G W, Booz; K M, Baker;

Role of Type 1 and Type 2 Angiotensin Receptors in Angiotensin II–Induced Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy

Abstract

We compared the ability of angiotensin II (Ang II) to induce hypertrophy of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes with that of endothelin-1. Over 72 hours, Ang II (1 μmol/L) increased the ratio of protein to DNA by less than 10%, whereas endothelin-1 (100 nmol/L) produced a 28% increase. The growth effects of either agonist occurred independently of chronotropic actions. Radioligand binding studies showed that myocytes have nearly 300-fold more receptors for endothelin-1 than Ang II, and type 1 and type 2 Ang II receptor subtypes (AT 1 and AT 2 ) are present in near equal proportions. Cotreatment with a 10-fold molar excess of AT 2 antagonists (PD 123177 or CGP 42112) for 72 hours augmented the Ang II–induced increase in the protein-to-DNA ratio to levels nearly as high (23%) as those with endothelin-1 (28%). AT 2 antagonists enhanced Ang II stimulation of protein synthesis, as indexed by [ 3 H]leucine incorporation, whereas an AT 1 antagonist blocked Ang II–induced incorporation. An AT 2 antagonist also prevented Ang II–induced protein degradation. In conclusion, Ang II–induced myocyte growth is tempered because of low AT 1 levels and an antigrowth effect of AT 2 . These findings have potential clinical significance in that regression of hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy by AT 1 antagonists may be in part due to an unopposed antigrowth effect of Ang II mediated via AT 2 .

Keywords

Receptors, Angiotensin, Pyridines, Angiotensin II, Imidazoles, Proteins, Cardiomegaly, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Animals, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    218
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
218
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!