Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Coronary Artery Bypass

Authors: Grady L. Hallman; Denton A. Cooley; Don C. Wukasch; John T. Dawson; Efrain Garcia; Robert J. Hall;

Coronary Artery Bypass

Abstract

From October 1969 through March 1972, 1,276 patients underwent coronary artery bypass at the Texas Heart Institute. Associated conditions included simultaneous valve replacement and resection or repair of ventricular aneurysms or ascending aortic aneurysms. Among the series were 1,105 patients who underwent bypass surgery alone, with or without endarterectomy. Factors affecting outcome were analyzed and revealed adverse influences including concomitant endarterectomy, female sex, age, evidence of left ventricular failure or serious ventricular dysfunction, and previous myocardial infarction within the month before surgery, but more importantly within the week prior to surgery. Functional class III and IV angina was significantly decreased or totally relieved in a high percentage of patients after bypass surgery, and remains the major indication at this time for myocardial revascularization. Progressive reduction in surgical risk and improvement in patient selection allow coronary artery bypass to be performed currently with an early mortality risk of only 3.7%.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Heart Failure, Male, Heart Valve Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Coronary Disease, Endarterectomy, Middle Aged, Transplantation, Autologous, Angina Pectoris, Aortic Aneurysm, Postoperative Complications, Postpericardiotomy Syndrome, Humans, Female, Saphenous Vein, Coronary Artery Bypass, Heart Aneurysm

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    35
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
35
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?