
doi: 10.11607/ijp.3908
pmid: 25390865
The purpose of this study was to compare patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance.Based on internationally accepted guidelines about dental esthetics, a questionnaire was developed to measure "dental appearance" (QDA). Eleven items defined a QDA score (0 = "absolutely dissatisfied" to 100 = "absolutely satisfied"). The QDA was completed by 29 patients (21 women, 8 men) before and after a complete oral rehabilitation that included restoration of the maxillary anterior teeth. Overall, 94 dentists from four countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, China, and Switzerland) evaluated the esthetics before and after rehabilitation on a visual analog scale (VAS: 0 = "absolutely unesthetic" to 100 = "absolutely esthetic").Patients and dentists of all countries found a significant esthetic improvement after treatment (P ≤ .0001). Significant differences could be found when comparing the evaluation of the dentists from the various countries among one another and with the patients' self-evaluation (P ≤ .05). With the exception of the professional rating of the initial situation, no gender-related differences could be found in any of the test groups.In daily practice, it seems of utmost importance for dentists to incorporate the patients' feedback in order to avoid esthetic treatment failures.
Adult, Male, China, Crowns, Attitude of Health Personnel, Culture, Dentists, Esthetics, Dental, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Dental Prosthesis, Dental Veneers, Patient Satisfaction, Germany, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Humans, Female, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Attitude to Health, Aged
Adult, Male, China, Crowns, Attitude of Health Personnel, Culture, Dentists, Esthetics, Dental, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Dental Prosthesis, Dental Veneers, Patient Satisfaction, Germany, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Humans, Female, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Attitude to Health, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
