<b><i>Background:</i></b> The diagnostic clues for autoimmune gastritis (AIG) can be classified into 2 categories: endoscopic findings and pathological diagnosis. We believe that research on the AIG detection rate by endoscopists could provide a better understanding of the diagnosis of AIG. This study aimed to clarify the ratio of the endoscopic and the pathological diagnoses of AIG. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). During their first EGD, the gastric mucosa with C2 atrophy or more was biopsied for pathological evaluation based on the updated Sydney system. A gastric biopsy was also performed after <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication, obtaining specimens from at least 2 sites, the greater curvature of the corpus and the antrum. We enrolled patients who were positive for the anti-parietal cell antibody and were diagnosed with AIG, histologically and/or endoscopically. The detection rates of AIG were compared between endoscopic diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 10,822 patients underwent EGD during the study period. Finally, 41 patients with AIG were enrolled, leading to an AIG prevalence of 0.38% in this study. As for the clue leading to AIG detection, 31.7% (13/41) were diagnosed through endoscopy (proximal-predominant atrophy), and 68.3% (28/41) were diagnosed pathologically. The AIG detection rate by endoscopists in the posteradication group was significantly lower than in <i>the H. pylori-negative</i> group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Endoscopists frequently overlooked AIG, especially in posteradication cases. Pathological assessment using the updated Sydney system after <i>H. pylori</i> eradication might be a promising strategy to detect AIG better.