Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Respirationarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Respiration
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Respiration
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Respiration
Article . 2020
License: CC BY NC ND
Respiration
Article . 2021
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Emphysema Patients with a Very Low DLCO

Authors: Marlies van Dijk; Jorine E. Hartman; Karin Klooster; Nick H.T. Ten Hacken; Huib A.M. Kerstjens; Dirk-Jan Slebos;

Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Emphysema Patients with a Very Low DLCO

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> For selected patients with severe emphysema, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (EBV) is recognized as an additional treatment option. In most trials investigating EBV treatment, patients with a very low diffusing capacity (DLCO) were excluded from participation. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Our goal was to investigate whether EBV treatment in patients with emphysema with a very low DLCO is safe and effective. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a single-center retrospective analysis including patients with emphysema and a DLCO ≤20%pred who underwent EBV treatment. Follow-up was performed 6 months post-treatment. Outcome parameters were compared to a historical matched control group (DLCO &#x3e;20%pred, matched for sex, age, forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV<sub>1</sub>], and residual volume [RV]). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty patients (80% female, 64 ± 6 years, FEV<sub>1</sub> 26 ± 6%pred, RV 233 ± 45%pred, DLCO 18 ± 1.6%pred) underwent EBV treatment. At 6 months follow-up, we found a statistically significant improvement in FEV<sub>1</sub> (0.08 ± 0.12 L), RV (–0.45 ± 0.95 L), 6-min walking distance (38 ± 65 m), and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (–12 ± 13 points). With the exception of FEV<sub>1</sub>, all exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. The most common serious adverse event was a pneumothorax requiring intervention (15%). There were no significant differences in outcome compared to the DLCO &#x3e;20%pred control group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this single-center retrospective analysis, we showed statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life up to 6 months after EBV treatment in emphysema patients with a DLCO ≤20% (14–20%) of predicted with no increased risk of serious adverse events.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

Male, Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, MONOXIDE DIFFUSING-CAPACITY, SURGERY, Walk Test, THERAPY, Severity of Illness Index, Prosthesis Implantation, Forced Expiratory Volume, MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE, Bronchoscopy, Humans, LUNG-VOLUME-REDUCTION, CARBON-MONOXIDE, Pneumonectomy, Diffusing capacity, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Exercise Tolerance, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, STANDARDIZATION, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, RESIDUAL VOLUME, Residual Volume, HIGH-RISK, Treatment Outcome, Pulmonary Emphysema, EXPERT PANEL, Quality of Life, Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity, Female, Endobronchial valve treatment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid