Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pathobiologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pathobiology
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Pathobiology
Article . 2019
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Myelodysplastic Syndrome Updated

Authors: Robert P, Hasserjian;

Myelodysplastic Syndrome Updated

Abstract

This review highlights the main changes in the revised 2016 WHO Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms (published in 2017) that impact the diagnosis and management of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The revision was based on data accumulated since the 2008 WHO classification of MDS, much of which relates to new molecular genetic information about these neoplasms. The new information has led to some reorganization of the MDS disease categories, including a broadening of the subset of cases classified as MDS with ring sideroblasts, many of which have mutations in the spliceosome gene <i>SF3B1.</i> Other revisions have refined the definitions of some disease categories to improve disease risk stratification. The revised categories in the new classification ensure that MDS patients receive risk-adapted therapies based on the most recently available data.

Keywords

Cytogenetics, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Mutation, Humans, RNA Splicing Factors, Phosphoproteins, World Health Organization, Algorithms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    44
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
44
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!