
doi: 10.1159/000438588
pmid: 26646027
Background/Aims: Gastric cancer (GC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Successful early cancer detection is hampered by lack of highly sensitive and specific biomarkers. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to an aggressive carcinogenic phenotype of many cancers. We hypothesized that changes in the mitochondrial proteome are required to support development of GC. Methods: TMT method followed by mass spectrometry analysis was utilized to quantify alterations in protein abundance in mitochondria enriched between noncancer and gastric cancer tissues. Results: Of a total data set that included 738 identified proteins, about 40.1% were found to be mitochondrial and associated proteins. Among them, 234 proteins were at least 1.5-fold up- or down-regulated in the gastric cancer compared with the adherent normal tissues. A number of markers (e.g. HSP70, HSP60, HSP90, leucine-rich pentatricopeptide repeat containing (LRPPRC), SOD2 and cathepsin B) were previously reported as biomarkers of GC. Additionally, several potential biomarkers participated in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and active fatty acid oxidation were firstly identified differentially expressed in GC samples. Our findings also suggest that VDAC1 may be a novel biomarker for GC. Conclusion: The results show that subcellular proteomics of tumor tissue is feasible and a promising avenue for exploring oncogenesis.
Proteomics, Physiology, Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1, Blotting, Western, Biomarker, QD415-436, Biochemistry, Mass Spectrometry, Mitochondrial, Mitochondrial Proteins, VDAC1, Stomach Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, TMT, Biomarkers, Tumor, QP1-981, Humans, Gastric cancer
Proteomics, Physiology, Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1, Blotting, Western, Biomarker, QD415-436, Biochemistry, Mass Spectrometry, Mitochondrial, Mitochondrial Proteins, VDAC1, Stomach Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, TMT, Biomarkers, Tumor, QP1-981, Humans, Gastric cancer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
