
doi: 10.1159/000381122
pmid: 26044100
There is mounting evidence that early continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from birth is feasible and safe even in very preterm infants. However, many infants will develop respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and require surfactant treatment. Combining a noninvasive ventilation approach with a strategy for surfactant administration is important to ensure optimal outcome, but questions remain about the optimal timing, mode of delivery and value of predictive tests for surfactant deficiency. Key findings in this review include the following: (1) a noninvasive ventilation strategy with CPAP from birth has a similar outcome to routine intubation in the delivery room; (2) prophylactic surfactant treatment has no advantage over early CPAP with selective surfactant administration; (3) surfactant during CPAP can be safely administered by rapid intubation-extubation (the INSURE method or via tracheal placement of a thin catheter), and (4) predictive tests for surfactant deficiency are being developed and might in future aid in directing surfactant treatment to infants at risk of developing severe RDS. A strategy for surfactant administration should be part of a noninvasive ventilation approach for preterm infants at risk of developing significant RDS. The different methods for surfactant administration during CPAP are reviewed here.
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Noninvasive Ventilation, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Pulmonary Surfactants, Infant, Premature, Time-to-Treatment
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Noninvasive Ventilation, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Pulmonary Surfactants, Infant, Premature, Time-to-Treatment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
