
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1159/000360763
pmid: 25060274
Disorders of sex development (DSD) are defined as 'congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical' [Lee et al., Pediatrics 2006;118:e488-e500]. Studies conducted in Western countries, with low rates of consanguinity, show that truly ambiguous genitalia have an estimated incidence of 1:5,000 births. There are indications that the prevalence of DSD is higher in endogamous communities. The incidence of ambiguous genitalia in Saudi Arabia has been estimated at 1:2,500 live births; whilst in Egypt, it has been estimated at 1:3,000 live births. This may be due in part to an increase in disorders of androgen synthesis associated with 46,XX DSD. There is clearly a need for further studies to address the frequency of DSD in communities with high levels of consanguinity. This will be challenging, as an accurate diagnosis is difficult and expensive even in specialized centres. In developing countries with high levels of consanguinity, these limitations can be compounded by cultural, social and religious factors. Overall there is an indication that consanguinity may lead to an increase in incidences of both 46,XY and 46,XX DSD, and a co-ordinated study of populations with higher incidences of consanguinity/endogamy is needed to resolve this.
Male, Disorder of Sex Development, 46,XY, Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Disorders of Sex Development, Consanguinity, Cholesterol, Testis, Androgens, Humans, Female
Male, Disorder of Sex Development, 46,XY, Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Disorders of Sex Development, Consanguinity, Cholesterol, Testis, Androgens, Humans, Female
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
