
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script><i>Purpose:</i> Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness, with an increasing incidence as the elderly population expands. Large, multi-center, randomized, clinical trials have been conducted exploring the safety and efficacy of anti-VEGF treatments. This paper aims to discuss the safety and efficacy of pegaptanib, ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab. New therapeutic agents and treatment strategies are also discussed. <i>Procedures:</i> Evidence available from prospective, multicenter, clinical studies and from a selective literature search is utilized to present the results of VEGF inhibition in neovascular AMD and to generate evidence-based recommendations. <i>Results:</i> Anti-VEGF treatment is indicated in choroidal neovascularization with active disease and produces a significant benefit in visual acuity. <i>Conclusions:</i> With the advent of anti-VEGF therapy, the prognosis of choroidal neovascularization has changed dramatically. Data from well-conducted clinical trials suggest that approved anti-VEGF drugs are effective and well tolerated.
Bevacizumab, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Ranibizumab, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Wet Macular Degeneration, Humans, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Aptamers, Nucleotide, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Bevacizumab, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Ranibizumab, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Wet Macular Degeneration, Humans, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Aptamers, Nucleotide, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
