Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ophthalmologicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ophthalmologica
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Ophthalmologica
Article . 2012
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparative Evaluation of Diaton and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers

Authors: Shibal Bhartiya; Tanuj Dada; Amit Sobti; Shveta Jindal Bali; Anita Panda;

Comparative Evaluation of Diaton and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers

Abstract

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> To evaluate the agreement between intra-ocular pressure (IOP) measurements with the Diaton and the Goldmann applanation tonometers (GAT). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this cross-sectional observational study, a total of 196 eyes of 196 participants (66 patients with glaucoma, 130 healthy subjects) were included. IOP measurements were obtained from all patients using the Diaton and GAT. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The average age of the patients enrolled in this study was 48.3 ± 14.6 years (range 18–79). The overall mean IOP measured by the Diaton was 17.2 ± 6.4 mm Hg, while that in glaucoma patients was 17.9 ± 6.2 mm Hg and in the control group 15.8 ± 4.9 mm Hg. Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a moderate correlation in IOP measurements by the two instruments in healthy controls (r = 0.460, p < 0.01); however, the same correlation for the glaucomatous subjects was noted to be poor (r = 0.261, p = 0.57). The limits of agreement (95% confidence intervals) ranged from –9.9 to +11.2 and from –15.3 to +19.7 mm Hg in healthy controls and glaucoma patients, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Diaton measurements do not correlate well with those provided by applanation tonometry. The two tonometers show very wide limits of agreement so they may not be used interchangeably in clinical practice for the measurement of IOP.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Tonometry, Ocular, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Female, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Intraocular Pressure, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!