<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1159/000336030
pmid: 22354063
When bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was first described in 1967, the use of assisted ventilation in neonates was in its infancy. High concentrations of oxygen were implicated, and BPD was equated with ‘pulmonary oxygen toxicity’. The etiologic role of not only oxygen but also peak inspiratory pressures and the duration of exposure to both was emphasized in the 1970s, but BPD remained a dreaded complication of managing respiratory distress syndrome in the 1980s. It was only after exogenous surfactant became commercially available for endotracheal administration that ‘classical’ BPD began to disappear and was replaced by the ‘new’ BPD. ‘Classical’ BPD was seen in more mature preterm infants (>28 weeks’ gestational age) and in its severe form was characterized radiographically by micro- and macrocysts of the lung, lung hyperinflation and flattening of the diaphragms. In contrast, ‘new’ BPD is seen in less mature infants (<28 weeks’ gestational age), has comparatively mild radiographic abnormalities and has been defined as continued oxygen requirement at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age. Pathologically, ‘classical’ BPD frequently revealed obstructive bronchiolitis and fibrosis of lung parenchyma, whereas ‘new’ BPD demonstrates minimal fibrosis but uniform arrest of development. Herein, factors which may contribute to the etiology of BPD are described, as well as possible preventative and therapeutic strategies.
Oxygen, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Respiration, Artificial, Infant, Premature, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Oxygen, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Respiration, Artificial, Infant, Premature, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |