
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>To assess the diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in ovarian lesions.Sixty-two fine needle aspirations of varied ovarian masses were performed between January 2000 and February 2003. Aspiration material was obtained from fresh tissues at the time of frozen section before dissection of the specimens. The slides were evaluated by a pathologist who was blinded to the gross findings and histopathologic diagnosis.A total of 62.9% of cases were assessed as malignant and 30.6% as benign. Two false positive and 2 false negative cases occurred. In our series the overall sensitivity and specificity were 95.1% and 90.4%, respectively. Seven benign and 15 malignant lesions could be subclassified specifically.We studied excised specimens, but since ovarian masses are reachable by laparoscopically and ultrasonographically guided aspiration, FNAC can be used for diagnoses of these lesions. If a multidisciplinary approach can be carried out in patients with ovarian lesions, cytopathologic interpretation can provide optimum benefits.
Adult, Adolescent, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Ovarian neoplasms, Ovarian cancer, Predictive Value of Tests, Aspiration biopsy, Neoplasms, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Prospective Studies, Diagnostic Errors, False Negative Reactions, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovary, Epithelial Cells, Middle Aged, Fine-needle, Disease Progression, Female
Adult, Adolescent, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Ovarian neoplasms, Ovarian cancer, Predictive Value of Tests, Aspiration biopsy, Neoplasms, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Prospective Studies, Diagnostic Errors, False Negative Reactions, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovary, Epithelial Cells, Middle Aged, Fine-needle, Disease Progression, Female
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
