Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of Oral and Vaginal Metronidazole Therapy for Nonspecific Bacterial Vaginosis

Authors: P, Bistoletti; B, Fredricsson; B, Hagström; C E, Nord;

Comparison of Oral and Vaginal Metronidazole Therapy for Nonspecific Bacterial Vaginosis

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, nonblind study was performed to compare the efficacy of a 7-day vaginal regimen with 500 mg metronidazole (Flagyl) once a day and that of oral treatment with 400 mg metronidazole twice daily for 7 days in the treatment of nonspecific bacterial vaginosis. No treatment was given to the sexual partners and there was no restriction of sexual intercourse. 38 women completed the study and at follow-up after 4 weeks, women receiving vaginal therapy had a cure rate of 79% compared with 74% in the women on oral therapy. Cure rates were lower among users of an intrauterine contraceptive device (57 versus 88% among nonusers). The occurrence of lactate-producing bacteria (lactobacilli and aerobic streptococci) in the vagina was significantly higher in women after vaginal compared with oral therapy. Gardnerella vaginalis was isolated in 58% of the women after vaginal and in 44% of the women after oral treatment. It is concluded that vaginal application of 500 mg metronidazole daily for 7 days is equally effective as oral administration in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Suppositories, Vaginal Diseases, Administration, Oral, Bacterial Infections, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Metronidazole, Vagina, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!