
doi: 10.1159/000282960
pmid: 9096272
We evaluated the effects of chronic renal failure (CRF) on the sperm fertilizing potential of rats. CRF was induced in 20 male 8-week-old Wistar rats (group A) by performing 5/6 nephrectomy in two stages. An additional 10 rats underwent a two-stage sham operation and served as a control group (group B). Seven weeks after the second operation, serum urea and creatinine concentrations were evaluated. Caudal epididymal spermatozoa from rats with CRF but not from controls had been filtrated via Sperm PrepTM tubes to isolate the sperm fraction showing strong forward progressions. Spermatozoa were processed for insemination often mature oocytes. After 18 and 36 h of insemination, the percentage of oocytes with two pronuclei and cleaved oocytes were evaluated, respectively. Serum urea and creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in group A than in group B. There was no significant difference between groups A and B in the percent sperm motility in final suspensions. The percentage of oocytes with two pronuclei and cleaved oocytes were significantly lower in group A than in group B . The present study suggests that CRF has adverse effects on the overall sperm fertilizing capacity.
Male, Sperm-Ovum Interactions, Infertility, Male/etiology, Sperm-Ovum Interactions/*physiology, Sperm Motility/*physiology, Fertilization in Vitro, Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications/*physiopathology, Rats, Sperm Motility, Animals, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female, Rats, Wistar, Infertility, Male
Male, Sperm-Ovum Interactions, Infertility, Male/etiology, Sperm-Ovum Interactions/*physiology, Sperm Motility/*physiology, Fertilization in Vitro, Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications/*physiopathology, Rats, Sperm Motility, Animals, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female, Rats, Wistar, Infertility, Male
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
