
doi: 10.1159/000229298
pmid: 19707037
<i>Purpose:</i> To evaluate the Integrated Cochlear Profile for Assessing Auditory Nerve-Auditory Pathway Integrity (ICP-API), as proposed by our group, in the selection of cochlear implant candidates. <i>Procedures:</i> The API of the candidates for cochlear implantation were assessed with the ICP-API, which consists of 5 categories including: audiological testing; radiological imaging study; ear-canal electric response audiometry; response to environmental sounds; speech development level. The auditory rehabilitation effects of the cochlear implantation receivers were evaluated postoperatively. <i>Results:</i> Sixty-six of 68 candidates who met the criteria of the ICP-API received cochlear implantation with improved hearing and speech development postoperatively. The remaining 2 of the 68 candidates were diagnosed with bilateral auditory nerves aplasia, and therefore failed cochlear implants were avoided. <i>Conclusion:</i> The ICP-API is valuable and feasible for the selection of cochlear implant candidates. The API should be considered as one of the most important criteria for cochlear implant candidate selection.
Male, Auditory Pathways, Adolescent, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Hearing Tests, Patient Selection, Infant, Language Development, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cochlear Implants, Audiometry, Child, Preschool, Humans, Speech, Female, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cochlear Nerve, Ear Canal, Retrospective Studies
Male, Auditory Pathways, Adolescent, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Hearing Tests, Patient Selection, Infant, Language Development, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cochlear Implants, Audiometry, Child, Preschool, Humans, Speech, Female, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cochlear Nerve, Ear Canal, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
