<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects: An Update

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2004Publisher:S. Karger AGJournal:Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, volume 19, pages 385-398 (issn: 1015-3837, eissn: 1421-9964,

Authors: R. Douglas Wilson; Mark P. Johnson;

doi: 10.1159/000078990

pmid: 15305094

Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects: An Update

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Objective: To review published peer-reviewed literature regarding abdominal wall defects including gastroschisis and omphalocele. Methods: Review of published peer-reviewed literature using Med Line 1985–2003 and textbooks. Results: Gastroschisis and omphalocele literature is reviewed using pathology, incidence and epidemiology, prenatal evaluation, pregnancy and delivery management, postnatal outcome and fetal therapy. Conclusion: Gastroschisis and omphalocele are common abdominal wall defects and have significant morbidity and mortality.

Related Organizations

University of Pennsylvania
United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
United States

Keywords

Gastroschisis, Disease Models, Animal, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Infant, Newborn, Animals, Humans, Female, Hernia, Umbilical

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	148
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%