
doi: 10.1159/000073581
pmid: 13679657
Meta-analysis is a valuable method of aggregating data sets of different trials which are inadequate or unconvincing on their own. There are strict rules on the retrieval and selection of data which are crucial in terms of the validity of a meta-analysis. Many so-called meta-analyses are flawed because of lack of a protocol or non adherence to it. Also underreporting of clinical trials is haunting the validity of meta-analysis. This hidden information is not a random process but is affecting mainly trials with negative results. To avoid this publication bias all clinical trials should enter an international online database.
Meta-Analysis as Topic, Sample Size, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Meta-Analysis as Topic, Sample Size, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
