Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ORLarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ORL
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ORL
Article . 2003
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Postoperative Pain in Tonsillectomy: Comparison of Ultrasonic Tonsillectomy versus Blunt Dissection Tonsillectomy

Authors: Natsuki, Sugiura; Kentaro, Ochi; Yasushi, Komatsuzaki; Hirohito, Nishino; Toru, Ohashi;

Postoperative Pain in Tonsillectomy: Comparison of Ultrasonic Tonsillectomy versus Blunt Dissection Tonsillectomy

Abstract

Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and postoperative appetite were compared between 15 adult patients who underwent tonsillectomy using an ultrasonically activated scalpel (UT) and 15 adult patients who underwent blunt dissection tonsillectomy with cold steel instruments (BT). The average intraoperative blood loss of the UT group was 4.6 ± 1.9 ml (mean ± standard deviation), while that of BT group was 41.9 ± 12.9 ml. This difference was highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the VAS pain and appetite scores between patients who underwent UT and those who underwent BT on any day in the 6-day postoperative period. Our current results show that UT is a safe technique, and we believe that it should be considered a useful alternative for tonsil surgery.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Postoperative Pain, Dissection, Ultrasonic Therapy, Blood Loss, Surgical, Appetite, Statistics, Nonparametric, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pain Measurement, Tonsillectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!