
doi: 10.1159/000056502
pmid: 9422086
The 56 MAbs submitted to the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop were analysed by ELISA assay for reactivity against synthetic MUC1 mucin protein core-related peptides. With peptides comprising 5, 7 and 20 amino acids, 4/56 (7.1%), 33/56 (58.9%) and 51/56 (91.1%) of antibodies showed positive reactivity, respectively. Peptides with 60, 80, 100 and 120 amino acids showed 50/56 (98.2%), 54/56 (96.4%), 53/56 (94.6%) and 47/56 (83.9%) antibodies with positive reactivity, respectively. The reactivity of each MAb with synthetic peptides was classified into 3 groups. In group A (15 MAbs), the reactivity increased depending on the peptides in length and was maximal with 20-, 60-, 80-, 100- and 120-mer peptides. In group B (24 MAbs), most antibodies showed very weak binding affinity to peptides with a small increase in reactivity with the 100- and 120-mer peptides. In group C (17 MAbs), the reactivity showed strong binding affinity with the 20-mer peptide followed by a reduced uneven pattern of reactivity with the 60-, 80-, 100- and 120-mer peptides. These results show that the binding affinity of MAbs against synthetic peptides does not depend on the recognition of antibodies to the epitopes of core protein.
Antibody Specificity, Immunodominant Epitopes, Molecular Sequence Data, Mucin-1, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Amino Acid Sequence, Epitope Mapping, Peptide Fragments
Antibody Specificity, Immunodominant Epitopes, Molecular Sequence Data, Mucin-1, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Amino Acid Sequence, Epitope Mapping, Peptide Fragments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
