
doi: 10.1159/000024014
pmid: 9876223
<b>Background:</b> It is usually difficult to differentiate between the pollens of different grass species on the basis of their appearance under a microscope, as they often appear similar. Such distinctions are important when interpreting the clinical relevance of pollens in air samples as individuals can differ in their allergic responses to different grass species. As this allergenic distinction occurs at the level of presence and differences of epitopes on the allergens associated with different species, it could be anticipated that species–specific monoclonal antibodies could provide such distinctions between pollens. <b>Method:</b> Monoclonal antibodies raised against Cynodon dactylon were screened and characterised in ELISA assays and blotting, using a range of grass pollen extracts, to identify clones which were species specific. <b>Results:</b> The most specific monoclonal raised to C. dactylon did not react at a level of greater than 1.2% to extracts of 10 other grass pollens in a direct ELISA assay and showed no detectable cross–reactivity in a particle blotting assay. <b>Conclusion:</b> It has been possible to produce a monoclonal antibody that is functionally species specific to C. dactylon.
Cell Extracts, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Immunoblotting, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Proteins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cross Reactions, Cell Fractionation, Poaceae, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Mice, Species Specificity, Animals, Pollen
Cell Extracts, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Immunoblotting, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Proteins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cross Reactions, Cell Fractionation, Poaceae, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Mice, Species Specificity, Animals, Pollen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
