Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PRISM: University of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/pr...
Master thesis . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

LiDAR Characterization of Boreal Understory

Authors: Losada Rozo, Silvia Alejandra;

LiDAR Characterization of Boreal Understory

Abstract

The understory vegetation layer contributes considerably to the physical structure of boreal forests. This research sought to understand the relationships between field- and LiDAR- (light detection and ranging-) derived measures of boreal understory structure. As well as how environmental factors may influence discrepancies that can arise between these derived measures. Five attributes to map and characterize the boreal understory vegetation were selected: mean understory height, percent cover, density, complexity, and volume. Percent understory cover showed limited bias in LiDAR-derived estimates of compared to field measurements, in northeastern Alberta. However, LiDAR was shown to underestimate understory mean height and volume, and to overestimate understory density and complexity. Generalized linear model regression analysis were used to understand the influence of external environmental factors on these error patterns. Explanatory variables for these models included canopy openings, bole density, canopy complexity, and ecosite type. It was found that canopy openings reduced errors in understory mean height, percent cover, and volume. Higher bole density was strongly associated with increased errors in understory mean height and volume, and had weak influence on errors in understory percent cover, complexity, and density. More complex canopies were seen to slightly increase the errors in understory volume and did not influence errors in the remaining attributes. Finally, ecosite had a strong influence on errors in understory mean height, complexity, and volume. In the final phase of this research, a series of predictive maps of understory structure were developed across a 4300-hectare study area in the central mixed-wood subregion of the boreal forest, with independent-validation coefficients of determination ranging from 0.41 - 0.59.

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

Remote Sensing, LiDAR, Ecology, Physical Geography, FOS: Biological sciences, forestry, Forestry and Wildlife, boreal forest, error, Understory vegetation, forest structure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green