
doi: 10.11575/prism/28902
handle: 1880/51358
In this paper I am going to argue that Pre-Latin and Proto-Romance shared the same syllable structure and that Classical Latin was innovative. I believe both Pre-Latin and Proto-Romance had the syllable structure VC$CV and that in the case of certain consonant clusters, this shifted in Classical Latin to become V$CCV in order to improve the syllabic contact. Thus it is from this Proto-Romance and Pre-Latin syllable structure that the modem Romance languages are derived and on which some important later phonological processes are based.
Romance languages, FOS: Languages and literature, Latin language, Linguistics, Linguistic change, Historical linguistics, Grammar, Comparative and general--Syllable, Proto-Romance language, Phonology
Romance languages, FOS: Languages and literature, Latin language, Linguistics, Linguistic change, Historical linguistics, Grammar, Comparative and general--Syllable, Proto-Romance language, Phonology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
