
pmid: 37168809
pmc: PMC10164869
The significance of deep learning techniques in relation to steady-state visually evoked potential- (SSVEP-) based brain-computer interface (BCI) applications is assessed through a systematic review. Three reliable databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and IEEE, were considered to gather relevant scientific and theoretical articles. Initially, 125 papers were found between 2010 and 2021 related to this integrated research field. After the filtering process, only 30 articles were identified and classified into five categories based on their type of deep learning methods. The first category, convolutional neural network (CNN), accounts for 70% (n=21/30). The second category, recurrent neural network (RNN), accounts for 10% (n=3/30). The third and fourth categories, deep neural network (DNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM), account for 6% (n=30). The fifth category, restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), accounts for 3% (n=1/30). The literature’s findings in terms of the main aspects identified in existing applications of deep learning pattern recognition techniques in SSVEP-based BCI, such as feature extraction, classification, activation functions, validation methods, and achieved classification accuracies, are examined. A comprehensive mapping analysis was also conducted, which identified six categories. Current challenges of ensuring trustworthy deep learning in SSVEP-based BCI applications were discussed, and recommendations were provided to researchers and developers. The study critically reviews the current unsolved issues of SSVEP-based BCI applications in terms of development challenges based on deep learning techniques and selection challenges based on multicriteria decision-making (MCDM). A trust proposal solution is presented with three methodology phases for evaluating and benchmarking SSVEP-based BCI applications using fuzzy decision-making techniques. Valuable insights and recommendations for researchers and developers in the SSVEP-based BCI and deep learning are provided.
Artificial neural network, Parallel computing, Artificial intelligence, Interface (matter), Cognitive Neuroscience, Memristive Devices for Neuromorphic Computing, Convolutional neural network, Review Article, Operations research, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Engineering, Machine learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Deep Learning for EEG, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Brain-inspired Computing, Biology, Bubble, Boltzmann machine, R, Life Sciences, Deep learning, Electroencephalography, Neural Interface Technology, Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neuroscience and Medicine, Computer science, Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Process (computing), Brain–computer interface, Operating system, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Physical Sciences, Medicine, Maximum bubble pressure method, Neuroscience
Artificial neural network, Parallel computing, Artificial intelligence, Interface (matter), Cognitive Neuroscience, Memristive Devices for Neuromorphic Computing, Convolutional neural network, Review Article, Operations research, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Engineering, Machine learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Deep Learning for EEG, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Brain-inspired Computing, Biology, Bubble, Boltzmann machine, R, Life Sciences, Deep learning, Electroencephalography, Neural Interface Technology, Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neuroscience and Medicine, Computer science, Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Process (computing), Brain–computer interface, Operating system, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Physical Sciences, Medicine, Maximum bubble pressure method, Neuroscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
