
SSAP method was used to study the genetic diversity of 22Linumspecies from sectionsLinum,Adenolinum, Dasylinum, Stellerolinum, and 46 flax cultivars. All the studied flax varieties were distinguished using SSAP for retrotransposonsFL9andFL11. Thus, the validity of SSAP method was demonstrated for flax marking, identification of accessions in genebank collections, and control during propagation of flax varieties. Polymorphism ofFl1a, Fl1b, andCassandrainsertions were very low in flax varieties, but these retrotransposons were successfully used for the investigation ofLinumspecies. Species clusterization based on SSAP markers was in concordance with their taxonomic division into sectionsDasylinum, Stellerolinum, Adenolinum, andLinum. All species of sect.Adenolinumclustered apart from species of sect.Linum. The data confirmed the accuracy of the separation in these sections. Members of sectionLinumare not as closely related as members of other sections, so taxonomic revision of this section is desirable.L. usitatissimumaccessions genetically distant from modern flax cultivars were revealed in our work. These accessions are of utmost interest for flax breeding and introduction of new useful traits into flax cultivars. The chromosome localization ofCassandraretrotransposon inLinumspecies was determined.
Ecotype, Genetic Markers, Polymorphism, Genetic, Retroelements, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, DNA Fingerprinting, Species Specificity, Flax, DNA Probes, Genome, Plant, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Phylogeny, Research Article
Ecotype, Genetic Markers, Polymorphism, Genetic, Retroelements, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, DNA Fingerprinting, Species Specificity, Flax, DNA Probes, Genome, Plant, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Phylogeny, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
