
Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis is becoming more and more important to detect sporadic primary tumors of the MSI phenotype as well as in helping to determine Hereditary Non‐Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) cases. After some years of conflicting data due to the absence of consensus markers for the MSI phenotype, a meeting held in Bethesda to clarify the situation proposed a set of 5 microsatellites (2 mononucleotide repeats and 3 dinucleotide repeats) to determine MSI tumors. A second Bethesda consensus meeting was held at the end of 2002. It was discussed here that the 1998 microsatellite panel could underestimate high‐level MSI tumors and overestimate low‐level MSI tumors. Amongst the suggested changes was the exclusive use of mononucleotide repeats in place of dinucleotide repeats. We have already proposed a pentaplex MSI screening test comprising 5 quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats. This article compares the advantages of mono or dinucleotide repeats in determining microsatellite instability.
Polymorphism, Genetic, DNA Sequence, Unstable, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Genomic Instability, Phenotype, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Other, Colorectal Neoplasms, Alleles, Microsatellite Repeats, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
Polymorphism, Genetic, DNA Sequence, Unstable, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Genomic Instability, Phenotype, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Other, Colorectal Neoplasms, Alleles, Microsatellite Repeats, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 155 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
