
pmid: 11090570
We hypothesized that decrements in maximum power output (W˙max) of the rat diaphragm (Dia) muscle with repetitive activation are due to a disproportionate reduction in force (force fatigue) compared with a slowing of shortening velocity (velocity fatigue). Segments of midcostal Dia muscle were mounted in vitro (26°C) and stimulated directly at 75 Hz in 400-ms-duration trains repeated each second (duty cycle = 0.4) for 120 s. A novel technique was used to monitor instantaneous reductions in maximum specific force (Po) andW˙maxduring fatigue. During each stimulus train, activation was isometric for the initial 360 ms during which Powas measured; the muscle was then allowed to shorten at a constant velocity (30% Vmax) for the final 40 ms, and W˙maxwas determined. Compared with initial values, after 120 s of repetitive activation, PoandW˙maxdecreased by 75 and 73%, respectively. Maximum shortening velocity was measured in two ways: by extrapolation of the force-velocity relationship ( Vmax) and using the slack test [maximum unloaded shortening velocity ( Vo)]. After 120 s of repetitive activation, Vmaxslowed by 44%, whereas Voslowed by 22%. Thus the decrease inW˙maxwith repetitive activation was dominated by force fatigue, with velocity fatigue playing a secondary role. On the basis of a greater slowing of Vmaxvs. Vo, we also conclude that force and power fatigue cannot be attributed simply to the total inactivation of the most fatigable fiber types.
Male, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Time Factors, Isometric Contraction, Diaphragm, Muscle Fatigue, Animals, In Vitro Techniques, Electric Stimulation, Rats
Male, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Time Factors, Isometric Contraction, Diaphragm, Muscle Fatigue, Animals, In Vitro Techniques, Electric Stimulation, Rats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
