
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script> Copyright policy )
 Copyright policy )doi: 10.1148/rg.256055069
pmid: 16284139
The assessment of penile cancer on the basis of clinical findings alone can often result in inaccurate staging and suboptimal treatment. Imaging of primary penile cancer and metastatic lymphadenopathy can help optimize planning of both primary tumor resection and treatment for lymph node metastases. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most accurate imaging modality in the assessment of primary penile cancers, which usually manifest as solitary, ill-defined infiltrating tumors that are hypointense on both T1- and T2-weighted MR images. T2-weighted MR imaging allows delineation of the tumor margin and of any extension into the penile shaft. On gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, the tumors enhance to a greater extent than do the corpora cavernosa. In addition, the recently introduced technique known as lymphotrophic nanoparticle-enhanced MR imaging can help identify metastatic lymph node disease. However, further studies will be needed to determine the role of this imaging technique in clinical practice. Computed tomography does not clearly depict the local extension of primary penile cancer; however, it is useful in assessing metastases and postoperative complications.
Male, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Penile Neoplasms, Penis
Male, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Penile Neoplasms, Penis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | 
