Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Uterine neoplasms: magnetization transfer analysis of MR images.

Authors: Yasutomi Kinosada; Shigeki Kobayashi; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Hajime Sakuma; Kan Takeda;

Uterine neoplasms: magnetization transfer analysis of MR images.

Abstract

To determine whether the magnetization transfer effects seen at fast spin-echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provide additional information in the diagnosis of uterine neoplasms.MR images were obtained in 58 subjects with a normal uterus, 27 patients with cervical carcinoma (17 before therapy; 10 after irradiation), 10 with endometrial carcinoma, and five with endometrial hyperplasia. The magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) were calculated by measuring the signal intensity on the central section of multisection fast SE images (15 sections) and that on a single-section fast SE image (5,000/136 [repetition time msec/echo time msec]). The additional imaging time required for MTR measurement was 4 minutes.Conspicuity of lesions and normal zonal anatomy was improved with single-section fast SE. The mean MTR in untreated cervical carcinoma (37.6% +/- 4.2 [standard deviation]) showed a statistically significant increase relative to that in irradiated cervical carcinoma (24.5% +/- 5.1, P < .01), normal cervical stroma (23.8% +/- 6.7, P < .01), or normal endocervix (24.2% +/- 7.3, P < .01). The mean MTR in endometrial carcinoma (34.5% +/- 3.6) was significantly higher than that in endometrial hyperplasia (25.5% +/- 1.5, P < .01) or normal endometrium (24.3% +/- 3.6, P < .01).Single-section fast SE imaging provides better lesion contrast than multisection fast SE imaging and enables quantification of the MTRs in uterine neoplasms.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Endometrial Neoplasms, Endometrial Hyperplasia, Uterine Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!