Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Relative Biological Effectiveness of Fast Neutrons for Mammalian Tissues

Authors: S B, Field;

The Relative Biological Effectiveness of Fast Neutrons for Mammalian Tissues

Abstract

Fast neutrons are at present being considered as a possible alternative to more conventional radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer. The relative biological effectiveness (R.B.E.) of this high linear energy transfer (L.E.T.) radiation is known to depend on the size of the dose (1,2). It is also of considerable importance to the therapist to know whether the R.B.E changes markedly with the particular tissue being irradiated. Basic Differences Between Survival Curves Produced by X Rays and Fast Neutrons: There are three basic differences between the survival curves produced by exposing mammalian cells to low- and high-L.E.T. radiations, e.g., x rays and fast neutrons: (a) At all dose levels, the R.B.E.3 for fast neutrons relative to x rays remains greater than unity (Fig. 1). (b) The shoulder of the survival curve for cells irradiated with x rays is normally larger than that for irradiation with fast neutrons, i.e., the extrapolation number is larger with x rays than with neutrons. A consequence of this di...

Keywords

Male, Neutrons, Leukemia, Experimental, Hematopoietic System, Radiotherapy Dosage, Chick Embryo, Fibroblasts, In Vitro Techniques, Kidney, Leukemia, Lymphoid, Rats, Intestines, Radiotherapy, High-Energy, Mice, Cartilage, Cricetinae, Neoplasms, Animals, Humans, HeLa Cells

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    89
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
89
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!