
doi: 10.1148/82.5.898
pmid: 14153683
Early roentgen electron optical image intensifiers were said to produce an increase in brightness of 500 to 1,000 times when compared with a standard fluoroscopic screen. The light levels were, therefore, of the order of 0.003 cd∕m2 to 3 cd∕m2. Different manufacturers now claim between 1,000 and 6,000 times intensification, but they give very vague information about the screen used for the comparison. Often a Patterson B-2 or CB-2 screen is said to have been employed, but no data are given concerning its age and other parameters. Sometimes special screens have been utilized which are not available on the market. Frequently no mention is made of the radiation quality employed for the measurements. In 1956 the International Commission on Radiological Units (ICRU) formed a Subcommittee to establish standards for measurements of image intensifiers. This Subcommittee finished its work in 1962 and the reports are published in the National Bureau of Standards Handbook 89 (August 1963) (1). It is important to sum...
Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Equipment and Supplies, Radiology, Technology, Radiologic
Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Equipment and Supplies, Radiology, Technology, Radiologic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
