Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of Film Size in Cineradiography

Authors: J A, CAMPBELL; E C, KLATTE; D D, GRAY; A L, McCREA;

Evaluation of Film Size in Cineradiography

Abstract

The advent of larger image-intensifying tubes with higher brightness gain has solved many of the problems of radiation dose and field size in cineradiography. Limited image detail remains as the most critical obstacle to be overcome if this method is to have a wider range of diagnostic usefulness. It is the purpose of this presentation to evaluate the relative merits of film size alone as a determining factor in the quality of a cine-image. Obviously, the film can record an image no better in detail than the quality and adjustment of the image intensifier and lens system will produce. It is obvious, furthermore, that the larger of two films with the same emulsion characteristics will present a greater number of photosensitive grains to accept the image; hence it can potentially yield more detail. Because of the very limited resolving power of present-day image tubes, the question of whether there is any critical gain in diagnostic yield through the use of 35-mm. film is pertinent. Factors Affecting the Ev...

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cineradiography, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!