Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Relative Biologic Effects of X-Rays and Beta Rays

Authors: W B, SEAMAN; M M, TER-POGOSSIAN; W B, ITTNER;

The Relative Biologic Effects of X-Rays and Beta Rays

Abstract

Investigations of the biologic effects of different types of ionizing radiations suggest that quantitative differences in response occur even though identical amounts of energy are absorbed per unit volume of tissue. Since the development of technics for the treatment of cancer and other diseases with radioactive isotopes, information regarding the relative biologic efficiency of the emitted beta particles and x-rays is required to utilize properly the knowledge that has been acquired by experience with x-rays. We, as well as others (9), have been impressed with the striking tolerance of normal tissue for beta irradiation. The dosage that may be given without producing necrosis or other serious reactions seems to be many times greater for beta rays than for 200-kv x-rays. Most of the data in the literature regarding relative biologic efficiency deal with alpha rays, neutrons, gamma rays, and supervoltage x-rays. Among the reports comparing beta rays and x-rays there is a lack of uniformity in results obta...

Related Organizations
Keywords

Radiation Effects, Biological Products, X-Rays, Humans, Beta Particles

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!