
doi: 10.1148/65.2.260
pmid: 13245973
Investigations of the biologic effects of different types of ionizing radiations suggest that quantitative differences in response occur even though identical amounts of energy are absorbed per unit volume of tissue. Since the development of technics for the treatment of cancer and other diseases with radioactive isotopes, information regarding the relative biologic efficiency of the emitted beta particles and x-rays is required to utilize properly the knowledge that has been acquired by experience with x-rays. We, as well as others (9), have been impressed with the striking tolerance of normal tissue for beta irradiation. The dosage that may be given without producing necrosis or other serious reactions seems to be many times greater for beta rays than for 200-kv x-rays. Most of the data in the literature regarding relative biologic efficiency deal with alpha rays, neutrons, gamma rays, and supervoltage x-rays. Among the reports comparing beta rays and x-rays there is a lack of uniformity in results obta...
Radiation Effects, Biological Products, X-Rays, Humans, Beta Particles
Radiation Effects, Biological Products, X-Rays, Humans, Beta Particles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
