Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Myositis Ossificans Progressiva

Authors: E B, SINGLETON; J F, HOLT;

Myositis Ossificans Progressiva

Abstract

In 1692 Patin (1) described the first case of progressive muscle ossification and in 1868 von Dusch (2) gave the disease its present name of myositis ossificans progressiva. A detailed survey of the literature was published by Rosenstirn (3) in 1918, and in 1932 Mair (4) reviewed the subject thoroughly and published two cases of his own. In Mair's report the suggestion was made that the name be changed to “fibrositis ossificans progressiva” because actually the disease involves the connective tissue rather than the muscles. Although this term is more descriptive of the pathological process, the original nomenclature has common usage and will be employed in this paper. Numerous case reports of myositis ossificans progressiva have appeared in the medical literature in the past half century, and yet it remains a medical enigma. Antecedent infection, especially rheumatic fever, has frequently been associated with this disease but there is no proof that the relationship is anything but coincidental. Trauma, al...

Keywords

Myositis Ossificans, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!