
doi: 10.1148/52.2.220
pmid: 18110232
Cancer of the male breast is rare and the end-results are disappointing. Among the factors that contribute to the poor prognosis is the fact that to many physicians mammary carcinoma in the male is something of a myth—an oddity in medicine—and for that reason inconsequential. Unfortunately, both the medical profession and the layman underestimate any mammary lesion in the male, and diagnosis is made too late for adequate intervention to effect a cure. The infrequency of tumors of the male breast may be explained on both anatomical and physiological grounds. Most textbooks of anatomy present an erroneous impression of the male mammary gland. Cunningham and Gray pass over the subject superficially, describing the male breast as a vestigial and rudimentary organ, and one is left with the impression that it contains only scraps of glandular tissue. A good anatomical description is to be found in the paper by Andrews, whose observations are based on sections of normal breasts taken from subjects of all ages. I...
Male, Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Breast
Male, Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Breast
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
