
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This paper reviews the past 25 years of applied social research, with an emphasis on evaluation research, whose intent is the estimation of the net impacts or effects of social programs. The 1960s and early 1970s represent the "Golden Age" of evaluation, an age that ended with the Reagan Administration. During this period, the evaluation field was dominated by the randomized, controlled experimental paradigm. Accordingly, several of the major field experiments of the era are reviewed in some detail. Recently, various alternatives to this paradigm have been advanced; they too are discussed. The key lesson from the Golden Age is that the expected effects of social programs hover near zero, a devastating discovery for the social reformers of the time. Some reasons why this is the case are presented. One important
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 92 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
