
pmid: 11160785
▪ Abstract Clinical cancer genetics is becoming an integral part of the care of cancer patients. This review describes the clinical aspects, genetics, and clinical genetic management of most of the major hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and familial adenomatous polyposis are examples of syndromes for which genetic testing to identify at-risk family members is considered the standard of care. Genetic testing for these syndromes is sensitive and affordable, and it will change medical management. Cancer genetic counseling and testing is probably beneficial in other syndromes, such as the hereditary breast cancer syndromes, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and juvenile polyposis. There are also hereditary cancer syndromes for which testing is not yet available and/or is unlikely to change medical management, including Li-Fraumeni syndrome and hereditary malignant melanoma. Thorough medical care requires the identification of families likely to have a hereditary cancer susceptibility syndrome for referral to cancer genetics professionals.
Ovarian Neoplasms, von Hippel-Lindau Disease, Incidence, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia, Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome, Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pedigree, Causality, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple, Melanoma
Ovarian Neoplasms, von Hippel-Lindau Disease, Incidence, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia, Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome, Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pedigree, Causality, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple, Melanoma
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
