
According to their temporal behavior, faults in computer systems are classified into permanent, intermittent, and transient faults. Since it is impossible to identify the type of a fault upon its first detection, the common practice is to retry the failed instruction one or more times and then use other fault recovery methods, such as rollback or restart, if the retry is not successful. To determine an “optimal” (in some sense) number of retries, we need to know several fault parameters, which can be estimated only after classifying all the faults detected in the past. In this paper we propose a new fault classification scheme which assigns a fault type to each detected fault based on its detection time, the outcome of retry, and its detection symptom. This classification procedure utilizes the Bayesian decision theory to sequentially update the estimation of fault parameters whenever a detected fault is classified. An important advantage of this classification is the early identification of presence of an intermittent fault so that appropriate measures can be taken before it causes a serious damage to the system. To assess the goodness of the proposed scheme, the probability of incorrect classification is also analyzed and compared with simulation results.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
