
doi: 10.1145/57669.57675
Programming style guidelines and automated coding style analyzers have been developed without a solid experimental or theoretical basis. In this paper we make a distinction between typographic style characteristics and underlying structural style content and show that this distinction aids in assessing the influence of style factors. This distinction permits straightforward identification of specific style factors and a better understanding of their effect on program comprehension. The results of our studies have a direct impact on automated coding style assessment programs, programming standards, program maintainability, and code formatting tools.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
